Talk:Community Updates/2008-09-17
From Openmoko
(suggestion) |
(suggestion) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
And that items that are over a week old are placed to something like: Community_driven_update_old_stuff | And that items that are over a week old are placed to something like: Community_driven_update_old_stuff | ||
This way this page will be easy to read and it will be clear what is new and what is not. | This way this page will be easy to read and it will be clear what is new and what is not. | ||
+ | |||
[[User:Gnur|Gnur]] 17:50, 17 September 2008 (GMT-1) | [[User:Gnur|Gnur]] 17:50, 17 September 2008 (GMT-1) | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 17 September 2008
I think every new item should have a date added to it and posted on the top of the page. So that the newest items will be on top. And that items that are over a week old are placed to something like: Community_driven_update_old_stuff This way this page will be easy to read and it will be clear what is new and what is not.
Gnur 17:50, 17 September 2008 (GMT-1)
Everybody loves Community Updates, but that's a huge endeavour for one person to tackle. So let us try a little social experiment here: community written community update. I posted an outlined list of bullet points, and left it to everybody else to elaborate along the following editorial guidelines:
- Include everything that was hot on a mailing lists at some point since launch.
- Limit each point to three sentences and one link.
MinhHaDuong 14:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)