User talk:Speedevil

From Openmoko

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/..
 
WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/..
 
Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)
 
Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)
 +
 +
You also replaced some text: "Chipsets suitable for a phone are likely to take some time to be available."
 +
Not true.
 +
Google a bit and you will find that Nokia introduced this already at the 3GSM. Other companies are working also on mobile versions.

Revision as of 22:32, 27 March 2007

I disagree to move the WirelessUSB section to the expansion section. What is the reasoning behind this? WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/.. Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)

You also replaced some text: "Chipsets suitable for a phone are likely to take some time to be available." Not true. Google a bit and you will find that Nokia introduced this already at the 3GSM. Other companies are working also on mobile versions.

Retrieved from "http://openmoko.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Speedevil&oldid=6911"
Personal tools

I disagree to move the WirelessUSB section to the expansion section. What is the reasoning behind this? WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/.. Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)

You also replaced some text: "Chipsets suitable for a phone are likely to take some time to be available." Not true. Google a bit and you will find that Nokia introduced this already at the 3GSM. Other companies are working also on mobile versions.