Talk:Widgets
From Openmoko
(Difference between revisions)
Caowai song (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
At the spec, the packages are grouping by sections. | At the spec, the packages are grouping by sections. | ||
It can't implement by using navigation list. | It can't implement by using navigation list. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Sean | Sean Moss-Pultz]] A: We were planning on using the [[Filter_Menu | Filter Menu]] to parse the different sections. Check out this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Application_Manager#Filter_Menu]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm just using the word "category" instead of "section" because I think it makes more sense for end users. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Q：SunZhiyong | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Why do the two widgits Top Panel and Footer Area be deleted? '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | A: ([[User:Sean]] These were moved to the application section. After Harald and Mickey's discussion, they realized these really should be treated as applications, not widgets. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:43, 11 September 2006
--Caowai song 03:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Q1:Do we need a tree to display package list at Navigation Area?
At the spec, the packages are grouping by sections. It can't implement by using navigation list.
Sean Moss-Pultz A: We were planning on using the Filter Menu to parse the different sections. Check out this:
Application_Manager#Filter_Menu
I'm just using the word "category" instead of "section" because I think it makes more sense for end users.
Q：SunZhiyong
Why do the two widgits Top Panel and Footer Area be deleted?
A: (User:Sean These were moved to the application section. After Harald and Mickey's discussion, they realized these really should be treated as applications, not widgets.
