Talk:Neo 1973
From Openmoko
(Difference between revisions)
0x5A5A5A5A (Talk | contribs) (→Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4)) |
m (delete incorrect info) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4) == | == Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4) == | ||
− | |||
Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. [[User:baseline0x0]] 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST) | Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. [[User:baseline0x0]] 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST) | ||
− | |||
+ | The CPU/SoC does not have USB2, hence no USB2.--[[User:Speedevil|Speedevil]] 21:22, 16 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
Why no EDGE? The speaker will be mono in the gta02 but the headphone jack will still have the potential for stereo out, correct? | Why no EDGE? The speaker will be mono in the gta02 but the headphone jack will still have the potential for stereo out, correct? |
Revision as of 21:22, 16 August 2007
Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4)
Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. User:baseline0x0 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST)
The CPU/SoC does not have USB2, hence no USB2.--Speedevil 21:22, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
Why no EDGE? The speaker will be mono in the gta02 but the headphone jack will still have the potential for stereo out, correct?