Talk:Neo 1973
From Openmoko
(Difference between revisions)
Guinness2702 (Talk | contribs) |
Baseline0x0 (Talk | contribs) (→Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4) == | == Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4) == | ||
So, in the features lists, it is spelt "Neo1973" and "Neo 1973". Which one is correct then? [[User:Guinness2702|Guinness2702]] 11:43, 11 July 2007 (CEST) | So, in the features lists, it is spelt "Neo1973" and "Neo 1973". Which one is correct then? [[User:Guinness2702|Guinness2702]] 11:43, 11 July 2007 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. [[User:baseline0x0]] 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST) |
Revision as of 19:47, 9 August 2007
Phase 1 (GTA01Bv4)
So, in the features lists, it is spelt "Neo1973" and "Neo 1973". Which one is correct then? Guinness2702 11:43, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
Why is there no usb 2.0? this would be a huge advantage, allowing fast disk i/o, even a vga dongle. User:baseline0x0 13:45, 9 Augest 2007 (CEST)